The Press Club Mumbai's first "elected " Internal Auditor Mr Oommen Ninan today visited the club and inspected various documents and took note of some comissions and ommissions , including shortage of about Rs 3000 at the cash counter.
As per his request , that was authorised by none other than the Club President Mr Pradip Vijayakar , an 'ordinary member' of the Club , CPJha was called to assist him in inspecting the Club documents.
The Club Chairman , Devendra Mohan , however , asked CPJha to 'get out' of the cashier counter saying that he did not know who has authosised him to do so.
At this CPJha vaccated the Cashier counter and yet offered his help to the Internal Auditor , if required, asserting that he was fully authorised to do so.
After that the Club's former secretary Gurbir Singh cornered CPJha and 'WARNED " him in front of the Chairman Mohan , the Managing Committee Member Joshi and senior member Mody for what he claimed was an excercise in frustration.CPJha just requested him to serve a letter in black & white in support of his contention.
Mr Gurbir Singh also asked CPJha to be ready for repercusssions.At this CPJha said " Please be calm , do not raise your fingers at me , I am willing to what is my duty under the constitution of the Club and if you have any objections please ask the President and the Internal Auditor ".
We shall revisit the 'incident ' soon after the Club managing committee formally files its objections.
A forum to strengthen democracy and good governance in the Press Club, Mumbai and restore its basic character to serve as an umbrella platform of mediapersons
Wednesday, October 1, 2008
Monday, July 28, 2008
CPJha thanks all the Voter-Member of the Press Club ,Mumbai
Thanks a ton members for supporting me and giving me 29 per cent votes in the presidential polls.
Dear members,
Thanks a lot for your support to the principles for which I contested the 2008-10 Press Club, Mumbai polls.
I thank you once again for giving me 29 per cent of votes in the Presidential polls.
I do respect the verdict and congratulate all the winners.
Kindly also allow me to thank you , all the Club members, who participated in Friday’s Annual General Body Meeting (AGM) of the Club on July 25 , 2008 and the polls held the following day.
Similarly, I thank all such non-voter members of the Club and other journalist colleagues in Mumbai and elsewhere in the country, who evinced interest in the issues involved in the club elections, which we highlighted through this blog and other ways.
For your kind information, I had contested in this election as an independent candidate for the President’s post as also for the Managing Committee --- without any support or backing from the ruling panel of the Progressive Democratic Alliance (PDA)-led by the Club's outgoing secretary Gurbir Singh and the opposition panel of Forum for Democracy and Development (FDD)-led by the outgoing Internal Auditor G Vishwanath.
The PDA, which had not put up its candidate for the post of President for reasons best known to it, had tacitly supported Pradeep Vijayakar for this post. The FDD had declared Mr Vijayakar as its candidate for the post. Mr Vijayakar was declared re-elected as President for the second consecutive two-year term.
Out of 430 of total 711 votes polled in this election, 22 votes were declared invalid for the post of President. Mr Vijayakar secured as many as 297 votes, while I polled 110 votes in the Presidential polls.
Leaders of both the PDA and the FDD functionaries now say that even 110 votes that I secured was because of the “CONFUSION” among the voters, that it was by “DEFAULT”, as the PDA did not put up its candidate for the post and that I was seen in the company of FDD leaders.
Well, it is not my job to explain as to why the PDA had not fielded its candidate for the post of President.
An SMS message sent by the PDA to the voters on Sunday (July 27, 2008) claimed that it has won all the office bearers’ posts. It is now for the PDA to explain as to how it can make such a claim since it had not put its presidential candidate, let alone winning the president’s post. Or is the PDA suggesting that Mr Vijayakar was as much their candidate as he was of the FDD? Or does the PDA nurse the feeling that it can run the work the club without the President?
Strangely enough, Mr Vijayakar did not either actively campaign for the FDD panel or issue any statement himself that he was a FDD candidate and had nothing to do with PDA. All the same, it is not for me to question Mr Vijayakar for the stand he took in the polls.
However, I do have a question for both the FDD and PDA leaders: How do they explain the fact that I secured 90 votes in the Managing Committee Members’ poll, despite the fact that both the panels had put up their full quota of 10 candidates each.
While I respect the verdict, I intend to come out with some startling revelation in the coming days on the questionable manner in which Returning Officer Jatin Desai conducted the club polls. To say the least, the polls were not so free and fair as they ought to have been. Please do look out for my revelation.
CPJha
The Press Club, Mumbai , Membership No. 388
Mumbai
Dear members,
Thanks a lot for your support to the principles for which I contested the 2008-10 Press Club, Mumbai polls.
I thank you once again for giving me 29 per cent of votes in the Presidential polls.
I do respect the verdict and congratulate all the winners.
Kindly also allow me to thank you , all the Club members, who participated in Friday’s Annual General Body Meeting (AGM) of the Club on July 25 , 2008 and the polls held the following day.
Similarly, I thank all such non-voter members of the Club and other journalist colleagues in Mumbai and elsewhere in the country, who evinced interest in the issues involved in the club elections, which we highlighted through this blog and other ways.
For your kind information, I had contested in this election as an independent candidate for the President’s post as also for the Managing Committee --- without any support or backing from the ruling panel of the Progressive Democratic Alliance (PDA)-led by the Club's outgoing secretary Gurbir Singh and the opposition panel of Forum for Democracy and Development (FDD)-led by the outgoing Internal Auditor G Vishwanath.
The PDA, which had not put up its candidate for the post of President for reasons best known to it, had tacitly supported Pradeep Vijayakar for this post. The FDD had declared Mr Vijayakar as its candidate for the post. Mr Vijayakar was declared re-elected as President for the second consecutive two-year term.
Out of 430 of total 711 votes polled in this election, 22 votes were declared invalid for the post of President. Mr Vijayakar secured as many as 297 votes, while I polled 110 votes in the Presidential polls.
Leaders of both the PDA and the FDD functionaries now say that even 110 votes that I secured was because of the “CONFUSION” among the voters, that it was by “DEFAULT”, as the PDA did not put up its candidate for the post and that I was seen in the company of FDD leaders.
Well, it is not my job to explain as to why the PDA had not fielded its candidate for the post of President.
An SMS message sent by the PDA to the voters on Sunday (July 27, 2008) claimed that it has won all the office bearers’ posts. It is now for the PDA to explain as to how it can make such a claim since it had not put its presidential candidate, let alone winning the president’s post. Or is the PDA suggesting that Mr Vijayakar was as much their candidate as he was of the FDD? Or does the PDA nurse the feeling that it can run the work the club without the President?
Strangely enough, Mr Vijayakar did not either actively campaign for the FDD panel or issue any statement himself that he was a FDD candidate and had nothing to do with PDA. All the same, it is not for me to question Mr Vijayakar for the stand he took in the polls.
However, I do have a question for both the FDD and PDA leaders: How do they explain the fact that I secured 90 votes in the Managing Committee Members’ poll, despite the fact that both the panels had put up their full quota of 10 candidates each.
While I respect the verdict, I intend to come out with some startling revelation in the coming days on the questionable manner in which Returning Officer Jatin Desai conducted the club polls. To say the least, the polls were not so free and fair as they ought to have been. Please do look out for my revelation.
CPJha
The Press Club, Mumbai , Membership No. 388
Mumbai
Thursday, July 24, 2008
Why am I contesting for the President's post in the Press Club Elections
Why am I contesting for the President’s post?
Dear members,
Till some days ago, I was not keen on contesting the biennial Press Club polls, scheduled for July 26, 2008, owing to my pre-occupation with the “Save UNI” struggle that I have been involved with for nearly two years now and my disinclination to take active part in the electoral politics of the Club. However, the following reasons have compelled me to contest for the post of President in the polls:
1) Ahead of the close of nominations on July 21, 2008, I had a hunch that the Gurbir Singh-led ruling panel – Progressive Democratic Alliance (PDA), for reasons best known to it – was not putting up its nominee for the post of President. This meant that there would be only one Presidential candidate in the fray i.e., Mr Pradeep Vijayakar – fielded by the G Viswanath-led Forum for Democracy and Development (FDD). This would have led to the unopposed election of Mr Vijayakar for the post of the President for the second consecutive two-year term. For your kind information, Mr Vijayakar has held the President’s post for four terms during the last 12 years.
In the larger interests of the Club, I sincerely felt that Mr Vijayakar should not go unchallenged in the 2008-10 Press Club polls, considering that his performance as the President during 2006-08 has been rather pathetic. That is why I have decided to contest for the Club’s Presidential polls against Mr Vijayakar.
While I would deliberate at length on the performance of my opponent at a later stage, what immediately comes to my mind is a comment made by Mr Vijayakar in his appeal to the voters in the 2006-08 polls, in the context of increasing accountability in the current journalistic profession. He had this to say: “There are pressing times for journalists. The system of accountability has come into the profession. Perform or pack up. Stragglers have no place. The system of appraisal can easily weed out the shirkers.” Mr Vijayakar should realise that his statement applies to the Press Club, Mumbai, as well.
Having keenly assessed the functioning of Mr Vijayakar during the two years, I can without doubt say that he has not effectively utilised the powers vested with him as a President under Article 14 (a) of the Club’s by-laws which states thus: “The President of the Club shall oversee the functioning of the Managing Committee and he shall exercise the powers vested in him as the head of the Club elected by the General Body, to evaluate the performance of the Managing Committee, guide it from time to time, intervene decisively where there is malfunctioning or where there can be a possible breakdown in the administration. Further provided that in such eventuality, he shall enlist the assistance of the Internal Auditor as provided in Article 30”
Nor has Mr Vijayakar made effective use of the Internal Auditor as provided for under Article 30 of the amended by-laws, which mandates the Internal Auditor thus: “The Internal Auditor shall directly report to the President every three months on the performance of the Club. Further, the Internal Auditor shall present, if the situation demands, to the President an on-the-spot report on his own or at the behest of the President, if there is a likely breakdown in the Club administration or malfunctioning of the Managing Committee or any other development which necessitates the President's effective intervention”.
2) Another reason behind my deciding to contest the Presidential polls is rather saddening silence on the part of Mr Vijayakar on the appalling disregard shown by the outgoing Secretary Gurbir Singh to our the Institution Marathi Patrakar Sangh in our neighborhood and n the amended by-laws of the Club.
In this context, I would like to inform you that I have written several letters to Mr Vijayakar, with copies to Chairman Devendra Mohan, bringing to his notice the commissions and omissions of the outgoing Managing Committee and seeking his intervention. But, neither has Mr Vijayakar bothered to respond nor has the Chairman made amends within the Managing Committee.
3) I do not belong to either of the panels fighting the polls. If anything, I belong to a ‘minuscule minority” of members in the Club and those in the profession -- that is sane, sober and concerned, that believes in journalistic probity, that asks questions if something has gone amiss and that makes it a point to crusade against the omissions and commissions of rulers that be in a premier institution like the Press Club, Mumbai.
If I am contesting the Club Presidential polls, it is not because that I want to win myself and defeat anybody else in the polls – I honestly do not have a captive vote bank --, but it is because I would like to use the polls as means to reach out to my views to members on crucial issues – some of them constitutional and legal in nature and others relating to the day-to-day functioning of the club.
All the same, it is suffice to say in the end, – if elected to the post of the President by all of you – I would like to do the following:
a) Given that the Press Club, Mumbai, is not a legal registered body under any law of the land as it ought to have for an organization that has been existence since the early seventies, I would like to work towards to regularising/ legalising all matters relating to the Club. (On this count, I plan to bring out a fact-sheet during the course of my campaign).
b) I would dexterously discharge duties assigned to me as the President under Article 14(a), (b) and (c) of the Club’s by-laws.
c) I would also work ensuring that the various amended provisions of the Club’s by-laws are adhered to by the Managing Committee of the day in letter and spirit.
d) I would do everything at my command to uphold the dignity of the institution, would work in tandem with the Managing Committee, strive to make the functioning of the club as transparent as possible and contribute in my own to the growth of the Club.
e) Last but not the least, I would strive for increased participation of members in the activities of the club in general and its elections in particular.
I sincerely look forward to receiving your support my Presidential candidature in the Club polls, scheduled for July 26, 2008.
Warm regards
CP Jha
You may also write me at cpjha@yahoo.com
CP JHA
A senior journalist, CP Jha – better known as CP among his colleagues and friends – has been working for the United News of India (UNI) since 1986. Reporting on politics has always been his forte, CP has of late begun to cover events in business and corporate sectors, a new beat he has picked up on his own after coming to Mumbai in 2003. Though he is attached to “UNI-varta” – the Hindi section of the national news agency, he files copies both in Hindi and English.
Coming from a middle-class family in Bihar, CP has been associated with some movement or the other since his college days. Like thousands of other students of his time, CP was inspired by Jay Prakash Narayan to no end. And he took to JP movement during the Emergency days, like a fish takes to water.
A linguist, CP did his post-graduation in Chinese literature and language from the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) where, in fact, he learnt the arts and science of student union politics – a developed trait that has stood him in good stead in later years.
Though a product of JNU which has spawned hundreds of youngsters who easily get agitated, can hold forth on issues of ideology endlessly but can not deliver in the end, CP has attained a rare maturity over the years, is committed to the core on issues relating to UNI and various journalistic organizations. CP has been in the forefront of a long-drawn agitation against the desperate efforts by a media baron to take control of UNI. During the course of more than a year-long agitation, CP as an All India General Secretary of the UNI Employees Federation had gone a week-long fast in UNI’s Bandra office to protest against suspensions and transfers of the employees in October 2006.
The struggle by CP and his other colleagues in Mumbai, Delhi, Kerala and elsewhere in the country --- which took them to various courts and Company Law Board --has already paid dividends. And they have succeeded in restoring a status quo situation in UNI – which is now sans the control of the media baron.
During the “Save UNI” agitation, CP turned a chronicler of the troubled times within UNI, CP objectively documented the unpleasant events that befell both the employees and the news agency during those months and, at the same time, brought on record the overall history of the organisation, five years ahead it completing its golden jubilee of its formation, in his book “UNI - Back to Future” which is soon to come out with a forward by Veteran Journalist Kuldip Nayar.
Dubbed as an `activist-journalist' than a mere journalist, CP had earlier created a stir in the political circles of Uttar Pradesh in 1998, when he as a journalist launched a campaign against the `fake encounters' perpetrated by the police at the behest of the then Mulayam Singh Yadav dispensation in the state. In that "Campaign against Liquidation", he had not only crusaded against the unpardonable violation of human rights committed -- all in the name of eliminating criminals, but also meticulously documented in reams of pages the manner in which the police had targeted and bumped off `unwanted' elements.
CP is not sparing when it comes to his own ilk within the media. He made quite a few enemies within the journalistic circles of Lucknow in 1997, when he launched a campaign against "corruption in the media" allegedly involving at least 100 journalists. The then UP chief minister Mr Mulayam Singh Yadav had virtually bought over the journalists in question by gifting them with.
In Lucknow, CP along with senior journalist Radhika Ramseshan had around the same time crusaded against a pornographic magazine brought out by a section of journalists in the Press Club there in collaboration with some local politicians on the occasion of “Holi”. As part of the crusade, CP and Radhika had staged a dharna in front of then chief minister Mulayam Singh Yadav’s May-day meeting in the Press Club, prompting his successor, Mayawati to order a State CID inquiry against those behind the questionable magazine. Afterwards, the journalists and politicians concerned discontinued the publication of the magazine.
All through his 22-year-long career, CP has taken active interest in the issues relating to fellow journalists. During the period, he has been a member of several Press Clubs, including Press Clubs of India (Delhi), and Chandigarh Press Club
CP has been a member of the Press Club, Mumbai, since 2003. During the period, he has been very active and he has crusaded among other things against the questionable governance of the club by the Gurbir Singh-led ruling alliance, its utter disregard for the by-laws of the Club, Mr Pradeep Vijayakar’s failure to discharge his Presidential duties and determined efforts by the ruling dispensation to bail out Secretary (Mr Gurbir Singh) in the alleged violent incident involving the Secretary himself and member Renni Abraham.
After considerable deliberation, CP has now chosen to take a plunge into the electoral politics of the Press Club, Mumbai. More than winning the elections, CP wants to use the polls as a means to focus on the challenges before the Press Club, Mumbai, in the coming years.
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
MR GURBIR SINGH’S DOUBLE-SPEAK AND CAMOUFLAGE BARED
ISSUES
Members upset with the latest hike in liquor & food item rates at the club
NEW CLUB HOUSE AN ARCHITECTURAL BLUNDER!!! .
No fans, Only AC!!!
Centralised Air-conditioning System jacks up the club’s electricity bills.
"Hike in liquor charges by 15% has made the Club lose rather than gain revenue. More journalists find it easier on their pockets to entertain themselves at a 'Gokul' or a "Lalit” bars where the drinks are not only cheaper but come with a few free snacks as well. A huge guest fee for even those who do not drink has discouraged guest visitation and hit revenues"
Guess who took this stand. It is none other than current “Hon” Secretary Gurbir Singh, when he led an Opposition Progress Democratic Alliance (PDA) panel in the 2003-04 Press Club elections. In his desperate bid to return to power in the Press Club, Mr Gurbir Singh issued a two-page pamphlet headlined “Sleazy Watering Hole OR Prestigious Press Club" on June 24, 2003. While it is another matter the “Sleazy Watering Hole” campaign worked, his panel rode to power on this and some other planks during the 2003-04 elections and he became the Club Secretary, the somersaults he made subsequently make an interesting reading:
The same Secretary Mr Gurbir Singh, after being re-elected to the post during 2005-06, issued a notice to the effect what he called 'interim hike' in the bar rates.
Contesting the “interim hike” proposed by the Secretary, a member, CPJha sent Mr Gurbir Singh a protest e-mail, saying: "Even present liquor prices in the club are more than any ordinary bar/joint near it". He demanded that an SGM be convened to deliberate on the “interim” bar rates hike.
Mr Gurbir Singh, however, in his reply dated August 26, 2005 to CPJha, claimed that the Managing Committee’s proposal to hike the bar rates was discussed at length in the recent AGM and it was adopted 'unanimously'. He, however, said that "I don’t recall you opposing the hike, but we can check the AGM minutes".
"Also, I am sure you will agree that the Club or the facilities it offers cannot be compared to any 'ordinary' joint or pub nearby" Mr Gurbir Singh said, adding:” Having said that though, we would welcome a discussion on the financial issues involved and maybe the final committee recommendations can incorporate some of your suggestions"
The 'interim' hike in the bar rates continued till recently. However, the same Mr Gurbir Singh chose to effect one more hike in April 2008, without even bothering to take up the matter in the AGM this year. The manner in which Mr Gurbir Singh has gone about hiking the bar and canteen rates bespeaks of his utter disrespect for the General body of the Club.
This time around, members have taken the substantial hike in the bar and canteen rates with “a pound of salt” if not a proverbial “pinch of salt”. We, the members, are not aware of if a due procedure, like involving the bar and canteen sub-committee in fixing the new rates, was adopted and if it was the case then why the details have not been made known to the members. The secretary's notice claims the hike is just about 10 per cent.
However, a careful study of the old bar and new bar rates at the Press Club reveals that bar rates have gone up more than 10 per cent and, while the hike in the canteen rates ranges between 50 to 60 per cent and We have especially given below the tables of the old and bar rates, as also old and new canteen rates. The statistics shown therein are a revelation.
Price Hike in The Press Club, Mumbai
We are posting below a comparative chart of the old and new rates of food & bar items in the Press Club, Mumbai.
Food Menu
No Item NewPrice Old Price Price Rise Rise in %
Tea   6 4 2 50.00
Cofee   7 5 2 40.00
Veg. Starter
1 Chana/Sheng   10 6.5 3.5 53.85
2 Boiled Chana   10 7 3 42.86
3 Batata Wada   12 9 3 33.33
4 Bajia/Pakoda   12 9 3 33.33
5 Samosa   12 9 3 33.33
6 Paneer Pakoda   20 15 5 33.33
7 Cheese Sandwich 15 12 3 25.00
8 Sp.Mixture   12 10 2 20.00
9 Veg.Pettice/Bonda  12 10 2 20.00
10 Veg.Cutlet 12 10 2 20.00
11 Ragda Pattice 12 10 2 20.00
12 Fry Boiled Chana 12 10 2 20.00
13 Papad Fry 6 5 1 20.00
14 Chinese Bhel 20 17 3 17.65
15 Cauliflower Fry 20 17 3 17.65
16 Veg.Harabara Kabab 20 17 3 17.65
17 Bread Butter 7 6 1 16.67
18 Finger Chips 15 13 2 15.38
19 Misal Pav 15 13 2 15.38
20 Toast Butter 8 7 1 14.29
21 Veg.Club Sandwich 18 16 2 12.50
22 Masala Papad 10 9 1 11.11
23 Chana in China 22 20 2 10.00
24 Wada Sambar 12 11 1 9.09
Sea Food
1 Surmai Fry/Curry 50 26 24 92.31
2 Pomfret Fry/Curry 50 32 18   56.25
3 Bombay Duck 25 23 2   8.70
4 Mandeli Fry 25   23   2   8.70
Chapati / Paratha
1 Chapati 3 2 1 50.00
2 Bread Slice 2 1.5 0.5 33.33
Indian Dishes
1 Alu Palak 15 10 5 50.00
2 Dal Fry 15 10 5 50.00
3 Paneer Makhanwala 25 17 8 47.06
4 Channa Masala 15 11 4 36.36
5 Rajma Masala 15 11 4 36.36
6 BhendiFry Masala 20 15 5 33.33
7 Palak Paneer 20 15 5 33.33
8 Paneer Mutter 22 17 5 29.41
9 Veg. Kolhapuri 18 14 4 28.57
10 Chiken Boneless 40 32 8 25.00
11 Mix Vegetable 16 13 3 23.08
12 Chiken Masala 30 25 5 20.00
13 Kheema Fry 30 25 5 20.00
14 Raitha 12 10 2 20.00
15 Cauliflower Fry 20 17 3 17.65
16 Veg.Makhanwala 20 17 3 17.65
17 Chicken Moghlai 40 35 5 14.29
18 Chi.Kolhapuri(Boneless) 45 42 3 7.14
19 Chicken Haidrabadi 45 42 3 7.14
20 Chicken Tangdi Fry 45 43 2 4.65
21 Kheema Mutter 30 29 1 3.45
Non Veg. Starter
1 Omlet Toast 12 10 2 20.00
2 Sp. Omlet 18 15 3 20.00
3 Egg Bhurjee 15 13 2 15.38
4 Egg Pakoda 15 13 2 15.38
5 Egg Roll 16 14 2 14.29
6 Chi.Sandwich/Toast 16 14 2 14.29
7 Nargis Kabab 18 16 2 12.50
8 Boiled Egg 10 9 1 11.11
9 Chiken GoldCoin 30 27 3 11.11
10 Chiken Lollypop 34 31 3 9.68
11 Kheema Egg Roll 25 23 2 8.70
12 chiken Lollypop Gravy 40 37 3 8.11
13 Fry Boiled Egg 20 19 1 5.26
14 Chiken Crispy 40 38 2 5.26
15 Chiken Crunchy 40 38 2 5.26
Rice Preparations
1 Veg.Haidrabadi Biryani 35 3 5 16.67
2 Veg.Biryani 30 26 4 15.38
3 Kheema Pulav 38 33 5 15.15
4 Chiken Birayani 40 35 5 14.29
5 Chi.Bonless Birayani 45 40 5 12.50
6 Chi.Haidrabadi Biryani 45 40 5 12.50
7 Veg Pulav 28 25 3 12.00
8 Peas Pulav 28 25 3 12.00
9 Jeera Rice 28 25 3 12.00
10 Dal Fry Rice Mix 25 23 2 8.70
11 Methi Khichdi 30 28 2 7.14
12 Palak kichdi 30 28 2 7.14
Chinese Food
1 Veg.Hakka Noodle 30 26 4 15.38
2 Chiken Fried Rice 38 33 5 15.15
3 Chiken Schezwan Rice 38 33 5 15.15
4 Chiken Haka Noodle 38 33 5 15.15
5 Veg. American Chopsey 40 35 5 14.29
6 Chic.Manchurian/Chily 35 31 4 12.90
7 Veg.Stew Rice 45 40 5 12.50
8 Chi.American Chopsey 45 40 5 12.50
9 Veg.Combination Rice 45 40 5 12.50
10 Fish Roasted Chily 45 40 5 12.50
11 Veg.Fried Rice  28 25 3 12.00
12 Chi.Schezwan Noodle 40 36 4 11.11
13 Veg.Schezwan Noodle 32 29 3 10.34
14 Veg Thai Rice 32 29 3 10.34
15 Egg Fried Rice 32 29 3 10.34
16 Chiken Stew Rice 60 55 5 9.09
17 Chi.Combination Rice 60 55 5 9.09
18 Veg.Manchurian/Chily 25 23 2 8.70
19 Veg.Triple Rice 50 46 4 8.70
20 Veg.Shezwan Rice 30 28 2 7.14
21 Chiken Triple Rice 60 56 4 7.14
Tandoori Items
1 Paneer Tikka 40 35 5 14.29
2 Chiken Tikka 60 55 5 9.09
3 Tangdi Kabab 45 43 2 4.65
Soups
1 Chiken Noodle Soup 28 25 3 12.00
2 Veg.Manchow Soup 23 21 2 9.52
3 Veg.Sweetcorn Soup 23 21 2 9.52
4 Veg.Hot & Sour Soup 23 21 2 9.52
5 Tomato Soup 23 21 2 9.52
6 Veg. Noodle Soup 25 23 2 8.70
7 Chiken Manchao Soup 25 23 2 8.70
8 Chiken SweetCorn Soup 25 23 2 8.70
9 Chiken Hot & Sour Soup 25 23 2 8.70
No Bar Menu New Price Old Price Price Rise Rise in %
Whisky-Scotch
1 Jose Cuervo Tequila Peg 220 198 22 11.11
2 Jonny Walker Red Label 170 154 16 10.39
3 Sierra Tequila Scotch Peg 200 182 18 9.89
4 Cutty Sark Scotch Peg 200 184 16 8.70
5 Camino Real Tequila Peg 180 168 12 7.14
6 Chivas Regal Whisky Peg 320 300 20 6.67
7 Jonny Walker Black LBL 320 300 20 6.67
Whisky- Premium
1 Antiquity Blue Whisky Peg 80 72 8 11.11
2 Teachers Whisky Peg 140 126 14 11.11
3 RC Whisky Peg 64 58 6 10.34
4 100 Piper Whisky Peg 130 118 12 10.17
5 Blenders Pride Whisky Peg 66 60 6 10.00
6 Signature Whisky Peg 66 60 6 10.00
7 Black & White Whisky Peg 136 124 12 9.68
8 Antiquity Whisky Peg 70 64 6 9.38
9 Peter Scott Whisky Peg 70 64 6 9.38
10 Single Malt Whisky Peg 70 64 6 9.38
11 VAT 69 Whisky Peg 84
Whisky- Regular
1 Royal Stag Whisky Peg 42 36 6 16.67
2 DSP Black Whisky Peg 38 34 4 11.76
3 Bagpiper Whisky peg 26 24 2 8.33
4 Director's Special Whisky Peg 26 24 2 8.33
5 Green Label Whisky Peg 26 24 2 8.33
Rum
1 Bacardi Dark Rum Peg 62 56 6 10.71
2 Bacardi White Rum Peg 62 56 6 10.71
3 Mc Dowell's Dark Rum Peg 26 24 2 8.33
4 Mc Dowell's White Rum Peg 26 24 2 8.33
5 Old Monk Rum Peg 26 24 2 8.33
Beer
1 Fosters Beer 650 ML 78 70 8 11.43
2 Fosters Beer 330 ML 50 45 5 11.11
3 Kingfisher Beer 650 ML 76 69 7 10.14
4 K.F.Strong Beer 650 ML 66 60 6 10.00
5 R.C Beer 500 ML 44 40 4 10.00
6 Kingfisher Beer 330 ML 40 37 3 8.11
7 Kingfisher Can Beer 330 ML 40 37 3 8.11
Wine
1 Chantilli Wine 1 Glass 130 95 35 36.84
2 Jacobs Creek Dark Wine NIP 260 204 56 27.45
3 Jacobs Creek White Wine NIP 260 204 56 27.45
4 Fiquera(w) Wine Peg 12 10 2 20.00
5 Port Wine NO.7 Peg 12 10 2 20.00
6 Port Wine NO.7 Glass 28 25 3 12.00
7 Grover(R) Wine Glass 127 115 12 10.43
8 Grover (W) Wine Glass 127 115 12 10.43
9 Fiquera (R) Wine 375 ML 86 78 8 10.26
10 Fiquera (R) Wine 750 ML 172 156 16 10.26
11 Fiquera (w) Wine 375 ML 86 78 8 10.26
12 Fiquera (w) Wine 750 ML 172 156 16 10.26
13 Fiquera (R) Wine Glass 33 30 3 10.00
14 Fiquera (w) Wine Glass 33 30 3 10.00
15 Grover (R) Wine Half Bottle 286 260 26 10.00
16 Grover (R) Wine Peg 44 40 4 10.00
17 Grover (W) Wine Half Bottle 286 260 26 10.00
18 Grover (W) Wine Peg 44 40 4 10.00
19 Jacobs Creek (R) Wine Peg 187 170 17 10.00
20 Jacobs Creek (W) Wine Peg 187 170 17 10.00
21 Jacobs Creek (R) Wine Glass 187 170 17 10.00
22 Jacobs Creek (W) Wine Glass 187 170 17 10.00
23 Port Wine NO.7 750 ML 88 80 8 10.00
GIN
1 Gilbeys Gin Peg 30 26 4 15.38
2 Forbes Gin Peg 24 22 2 9.09
Brandy
1 Golconda Brandy Peg 24 22 2 9.09
Vodka
1 Fuel Vodka Peg 40 36 4 11.11
2 Smirnof Vodka peg 62 56 6 10.71
3 Absolute Vodka Peg 160 148 12 8.11
4 Alcazar Vodka Peg 30 28 2 7.14
5 Romanov Vodka Peg 30 28 2 7.14
6 White Mischief Vodka Peg 30 28 2 7.14
Breezer
1 Bacardi Breezer 275ML 56 51 5 9.80
Cocktails & Mocktails
1 Caipiroschka 90 70 20 28.57
2 Tropical Cooler 25 20 5 25.00
3 Fresh Fruit Smoothies 35 30 5 16.67
4 Virgin Mary 40 35 5 14.29
5 Bloody Mary 90 80 10 12.50
6 Mojito 90 80 10 12.50
7 Lemon Iced Tea 20 20 0 0.00
Soft Drink
1 Soda 330 ML 12 9 3 33.33
2 Lime Cordial Peg 10 8 2 25.00
3 Honey 1 Spoon 6 5 1 20.00
4 Cold Drink 300 ML 14 12 2 16.67
5 Diet Pepsi 330 ML 30 27 3 11.11
6 Diet Coke 330 ML 36 33 3 9.09
7 Tonic Water Schwepps 300ML 40 37 3 8.11
Note
* The rates in Blue colour shows the price hike more than 12%
# The rates in Red colour shows the price hike more than 25%
“After the recent hike, effected nearly a month after the inauguration of the new building of the Club on March 28, 2008, the average bar and food bills of the members have gone up by as much as 50 to 60 per cent. And this is not because that the members have increased their level of liquor intake or consumption of food items at the club. The consumption of these items by the members is more or less the same,” Sai Prasan, who had contested for the post of the Club's treasurer in 2006-08 elections, said after studying his and some other's bill for the last two months.
According to him, the 'outgoing' Managing Committee of the Club - led by its “Hon” Secretary Mr Gurbir Singh has jacked up the prices of both the food and bar items by 12 per cent to 95 per cent. The hike is more steep in food items than in the bar menu.
Sai Prasan is quite right as we, in our own study, found that the hike of a simple item like Shing is more than 50 per cent, while in the case of Surmai fish the hike is almost 100 per cent.
The new rates for the bar and food came into effect since April 29, 2008 when the inflation rate was below 8 per cent. The general impression among the members regularly visiting is that the MC has left no stone unturned to turn the club into a starred Hotel, where only elite sections of the society can afford to spend.
“There is no difference in the price list of a big bar & Hotel and the Press Club, now nicknamed the Club House", a member working for a language newspaper lamented, adding that now only those few members who earned fat salary in pink newspapers could afford to come to their club.
The other facts also falsify the secretary's reason to effect the price hike. The MC's annual report clearly says that as compared with the financial year 2006-07, expenses on the staff salary etc has remained more or less the same in the year 2007-08 and water and other charges are also the same. The members used the new club building just for four days in the last financial year and therefore they have reasons to know the actual reason for increase in the power charges.
Proper accounting norms say that the expenses on consumption of power in construction work of the new building has to be showed under separate heads.
And if the power charges have gone up in the club during the last two months because of air conditioning, then who is responsible for it? Is it not an architectural blunder that no provision has been made for ordinary fans in the area covered by Centralised Cooling System (CCS), which would have come in handy in turning off the CCS when it is not required?
Not only the Bar room, the Media Room and Lounge and Reception Counter area, but even the staircase and toilet are centrally air conditioned!! What is the total sitting capacity in the entire Centralised AC covered area and what was the sitting capacity in the same area in the old building? We can say with all the facts at our command that the sitting capacity in the said area has in fact gone down substantially.
If Mr Gurbir Singh does not agree with us, then let him provide the figures. We can only add to what we have said. Even the numbers of urinals and toilets have gone down.
Members upset with the latest hike in liquor & food item rates at the club
NEW CLUB HOUSE AN ARCHITECTURAL BLUNDER!!! .
No fans, Only AC!!!
Centralised Air-conditioning System jacks up the club’s electricity bills.
"Hike in liquor charges by 15% has made the Club lose rather than gain revenue. More journalists find it easier on their pockets to entertain themselves at a 'Gokul' or a "Lalit” bars where the drinks are not only cheaper but come with a few free snacks as well. A huge guest fee for even those who do not drink has discouraged guest visitation and hit revenues"
Guess who took this stand. It is none other than current “Hon” Secretary Gurbir Singh, when he led an Opposition Progress Democratic Alliance (PDA) panel in the 2003-04 Press Club elections. In his desperate bid to return to power in the Press Club, Mr Gurbir Singh issued a two-page pamphlet headlined “Sleazy Watering Hole OR Prestigious Press Club" on June 24, 2003. While it is another matter the “Sleazy Watering Hole” campaign worked, his panel rode to power on this and some other planks during the 2003-04 elections and he became the Club Secretary, the somersaults he made subsequently make an interesting reading:
The same Secretary Mr Gurbir Singh, after being re-elected to the post during 2005-06, issued a notice to the effect what he called 'interim hike' in the bar rates.
Contesting the “interim hike” proposed by the Secretary, a member, CPJha sent Mr Gurbir Singh a protest e-mail, saying: "Even present liquor prices in the club are more than any ordinary bar/joint near it". He demanded that an SGM be convened to deliberate on the “interim” bar rates hike.
Mr Gurbir Singh, however, in his reply dated August 26, 2005 to CPJha, claimed that the Managing Committee’s proposal to hike the bar rates was discussed at length in the recent AGM and it was adopted 'unanimously'. He, however, said that "I don’t recall you opposing the hike, but we can check the AGM minutes".
"Also, I am sure you will agree that the Club or the facilities it offers cannot be compared to any 'ordinary' joint or pub nearby" Mr Gurbir Singh said, adding:” Having said that though, we would welcome a discussion on the financial issues involved and maybe the final committee recommendations can incorporate some of your suggestions"
The 'interim' hike in the bar rates continued till recently. However, the same Mr Gurbir Singh chose to effect one more hike in April 2008, without even bothering to take up the matter in the AGM this year. The manner in which Mr Gurbir Singh has gone about hiking the bar and canteen rates bespeaks of his utter disrespect for the General body of the Club.
This time around, members have taken the substantial hike in the bar and canteen rates with “a pound of salt” if not a proverbial “pinch of salt”. We, the members, are not aware of if a due procedure, like involving the bar and canteen sub-committee in fixing the new rates, was adopted and if it was the case then why the details have not been made known to the members. The secretary's notice claims the hike is just about 10 per cent.
However, a careful study of the old bar and new bar rates at the Press Club reveals that bar rates have gone up more than 10 per cent and, while the hike in the canteen rates ranges between 50 to 60 per cent and We have especially given below the tables of the old and bar rates, as also old and new canteen rates. The statistics shown therein are a revelation.
Price Hike in The Press Club, Mumbai
We are posting below a comparative chart of the old and new rates of food & bar items in the Press Club, Mumbai.
Food Menu
No Item NewPrice Old Price Price Rise Rise in %
Tea   6 4 2 50.00
Cofee   7 5 2 40.00
Veg. Starter
1 Chana/Sheng   10 6.5 3.5 53.85
2 Boiled Chana   10 7 3 42.86
3 Batata Wada   12 9 3 33.33
4 Bajia/Pakoda   12 9 3 33.33
5 Samosa   12 9 3 33.33
6 Paneer Pakoda   20 15 5 33.33
7 Cheese Sandwich 15 12 3 25.00
8 Sp.Mixture   12 10 2 20.00
9 Veg.Pettice/Bonda  12 10 2 20.00
10 Veg.Cutlet 12 10 2 20.00
11 Ragda Pattice 12 10 2 20.00
12 Fry Boiled Chana 12 10 2 20.00
13 Papad Fry 6 5 1 20.00
14 Chinese Bhel 20 17 3 17.65
15 Cauliflower Fry 20 17 3 17.65
16 Veg.Harabara Kabab 20 17 3 17.65
17 Bread Butter 7 6 1 16.67
18 Finger Chips 15 13 2 15.38
19 Misal Pav 15 13 2 15.38
20 Toast Butter 8 7 1 14.29
21 Veg.Club Sandwich 18 16 2 12.50
22 Masala Papad 10 9 1 11.11
23 Chana in China 22 20 2 10.00
24 Wada Sambar 12 11 1 9.09
Sea Food
1 Surmai Fry/Curry 50 26 24 92.31
2 Pomfret Fry/Curry 50 32 18   56.25
3 Bombay Duck 25 23 2   8.70
4 Mandeli Fry 25   23   2   8.70
Chapati / Paratha
1 Chapati 3 2 1 50.00
2 Bread Slice 2 1.5 0.5 33.33
Indian Dishes
1 Alu Palak 15 10 5 50.00
2 Dal Fry 15 10 5 50.00
3 Paneer Makhanwala 25 17 8 47.06
4 Channa Masala 15 11 4 36.36
5 Rajma Masala 15 11 4 36.36
6 BhendiFry Masala 20 15 5 33.33
7 Palak Paneer 20 15 5 33.33
8 Paneer Mutter 22 17 5 29.41
9 Veg. Kolhapuri 18 14 4 28.57
10 Chiken Boneless 40 32 8 25.00
11 Mix Vegetable 16 13 3 23.08
12 Chiken Masala 30 25 5 20.00
13 Kheema Fry 30 25 5 20.00
14 Raitha 12 10 2 20.00
15 Cauliflower Fry 20 17 3 17.65
16 Veg.Makhanwala 20 17 3 17.65
17 Chicken Moghlai 40 35 5 14.29
18 Chi.Kolhapuri(Boneless) 45 42 3 7.14
19 Chicken Haidrabadi 45 42 3 7.14
20 Chicken Tangdi Fry 45 43 2 4.65
21 Kheema Mutter 30 29 1 3.45
Non Veg. Starter
1 Omlet Toast 12 10 2 20.00
2 Sp. Omlet 18 15 3 20.00
3 Egg Bhurjee 15 13 2 15.38
4 Egg Pakoda 15 13 2 15.38
5 Egg Roll 16 14 2 14.29
6 Chi.Sandwich/Toast 16 14 2 14.29
7 Nargis Kabab 18 16 2 12.50
8 Boiled Egg 10 9 1 11.11
9 Chiken GoldCoin 30 27 3 11.11
10 Chiken Lollypop 34 31 3 9.68
11 Kheema Egg Roll 25 23 2 8.70
12 chiken Lollypop Gravy 40 37 3 8.11
13 Fry Boiled Egg 20 19 1 5.26
14 Chiken Crispy 40 38 2 5.26
15 Chiken Crunchy 40 38 2 5.26
Rice Preparations
1 Veg.Haidrabadi Biryani 35 3 5 16.67
2 Veg.Biryani 30 26 4 15.38
3 Kheema Pulav 38 33 5 15.15
4 Chiken Birayani 40 35 5 14.29
5 Chi.Bonless Birayani 45 40 5 12.50
6 Chi.Haidrabadi Biryani 45 40 5 12.50
7 Veg Pulav 28 25 3 12.00
8 Peas Pulav 28 25 3 12.00
9 Jeera Rice 28 25 3 12.00
10 Dal Fry Rice Mix 25 23 2 8.70
11 Methi Khichdi 30 28 2 7.14
12 Palak kichdi 30 28 2 7.14
Chinese Food
1 Veg.Hakka Noodle 30 26 4 15.38
2 Chiken Fried Rice 38 33 5 15.15
3 Chiken Schezwan Rice 38 33 5 15.15
4 Chiken Haka Noodle 38 33 5 15.15
5 Veg. American Chopsey 40 35 5 14.29
6 Chic.Manchurian/Chily 35 31 4 12.90
7 Veg.Stew Rice 45 40 5 12.50
8 Chi.American Chopsey 45 40 5 12.50
9 Veg.Combination Rice 45 40 5 12.50
10 Fish Roasted Chily 45 40 5 12.50
11 Veg.Fried Rice  28 25 3 12.00
12 Chi.Schezwan Noodle 40 36 4 11.11
13 Veg.Schezwan Noodle 32 29 3 10.34
14 Veg Thai Rice 32 29 3 10.34
15 Egg Fried Rice 32 29 3 10.34
16 Chiken Stew Rice 60 55 5 9.09
17 Chi.Combination Rice 60 55 5 9.09
18 Veg.Manchurian/Chily 25 23 2 8.70
19 Veg.Triple Rice 50 46 4 8.70
20 Veg.Shezwan Rice 30 28 2 7.14
21 Chiken Triple Rice 60 56 4 7.14
Tandoori Items
1 Paneer Tikka 40 35 5 14.29
2 Chiken Tikka 60 55 5 9.09
3 Tangdi Kabab 45 43 2 4.65
Soups
1 Chiken Noodle Soup 28 25 3 12.00
2 Veg.Manchow Soup 23 21 2 9.52
3 Veg.Sweetcorn Soup 23 21 2 9.52
4 Veg.Hot & Sour Soup 23 21 2 9.52
5 Tomato Soup 23 21 2 9.52
6 Veg. Noodle Soup 25 23 2 8.70
7 Chiken Manchao Soup 25 23 2 8.70
8 Chiken SweetCorn Soup 25 23 2 8.70
9 Chiken Hot & Sour Soup 25 23 2 8.70
No Bar Menu New Price Old Price Price Rise Rise in %
Whisky-Scotch
1 Jose Cuervo Tequila Peg 220 198 22 11.11
2 Jonny Walker Red Label 170 154 16 10.39
3 Sierra Tequila Scotch Peg 200 182 18 9.89
4 Cutty Sark Scotch Peg 200 184 16 8.70
5 Camino Real Tequila Peg 180 168 12 7.14
6 Chivas Regal Whisky Peg 320 300 20 6.67
7 Jonny Walker Black LBL 320 300 20 6.67
Whisky- Premium
1 Antiquity Blue Whisky Peg 80 72 8 11.11
2 Teachers Whisky Peg 140 126 14 11.11
3 RC Whisky Peg 64 58 6 10.34
4 100 Piper Whisky Peg 130 118 12 10.17
5 Blenders Pride Whisky Peg 66 60 6 10.00
6 Signature Whisky Peg 66 60 6 10.00
7 Black & White Whisky Peg 136 124 12 9.68
8 Antiquity Whisky Peg 70 64 6 9.38
9 Peter Scott Whisky Peg 70 64 6 9.38
10 Single Malt Whisky Peg 70 64 6 9.38
11 VAT 69 Whisky Peg 84
Whisky- Regular
1 Royal Stag Whisky Peg 42 36 6 16.67
2 DSP Black Whisky Peg 38 34 4 11.76
3 Bagpiper Whisky peg 26 24 2 8.33
4 Director's Special Whisky Peg 26 24 2 8.33
5 Green Label Whisky Peg 26 24 2 8.33
Rum
1 Bacardi Dark Rum Peg 62 56 6 10.71
2 Bacardi White Rum Peg 62 56 6 10.71
3 Mc Dowell's Dark Rum Peg 26 24 2 8.33
4 Mc Dowell's White Rum Peg 26 24 2 8.33
5 Old Monk Rum Peg 26 24 2 8.33
Beer
1 Fosters Beer 650 ML 78 70 8 11.43
2 Fosters Beer 330 ML 50 45 5 11.11
3 Kingfisher Beer 650 ML 76 69 7 10.14
4 K.F.Strong Beer 650 ML 66 60 6 10.00
5 R.C Beer 500 ML 44 40 4 10.00
6 Kingfisher Beer 330 ML 40 37 3 8.11
7 Kingfisher Can Beer 330 ML 40 37 3 8.11
Wine
1 Chantilli Wine 1 Glass 130 95 35 36.84
2 Jacobs Creek Dark Wine NIP 260 204 56 27.45
3 Jacobs Creek White Wine NIP 260 204 56 27.45
4 Fiquera(w) Wine Peg 12 10 2 20.00
5 Port Wine NO.7 Peg 12 10 2 20.00
6 Port Wine NO.7 Glass 28 25 3 12.00
7 Grover(R) Wine Glass 127 115 12 10.43
8 Grover (W) Wine Glass 127 115 12 10.43
9 Fiquera (R) Wine 375 ML 86 78 8 10.26
10 Fiquera (R) Wine 750 ML 172 156 16 10.26
11 Fiquera (w) Wine 375 ML 86 78 8 10.26
12 Fiquera (w) Wine 750 ML 172 156 16 10.26
13 Fiquera (R) Wine Glass 33 30 3 10.00
14 Fiquera (w) Wine Glass 33 30 3 10.00
15 Grover (R) Wine Half Bottle 286 260 26 10.00
16 Grover (R) Wine Peg 44 40 4 10.00
17 Grover (W) Wine Half Bottle 286 260 26 10.00
18 Grover (W) Wine Peg 44 40 4 10.00
19 Jacobs Creek (R) Wine Peg 187 170 17 10.00
20 Jacobs Creek (W) Wine Peg 187 170 17 10.00
21 Jacobs Creek (R) Wine Glass 187 170 17 10.00
22 Jacobs Creek (W) Wine Glass 187 170 17 10.00
23 Port Wine NO.7 750 ML 88 80 8 10.00
GIN
1 Gilbeys Gin Peg 30 26 4 15.38
2 Forbes Gin Peg 24 22 2 9.09
Brandy
1 Golconda Brandy Peg 24 22 2 9.09
Vodka
1 Fuel Vodka Peg 40 36 4 11.11
2 Smirnof Vodka peg 62 56 6 10.71
3 Absolute Vodka Peg 160 148 12 8.11
4 Alcazar Vodka Peg 30 28 2 7.14
5 Romanov Vodka Peg 30 28 2 7.14
6 White Mischief Vodka Peg 30 28 2 7.14
Breezer
1 Bacardi Breezer 275ML 56 51 5 9.80
Cocktails & Mocktails
1 Caipiroschka 90 70 20 28.57
2 Tropical Cooler 25 20 5 25.00
3 Fresh Fruit Smoothies 35 30 5 16.67
4 Virgin Mary 40 35 5 14.29
5 Bloody Mary 90 80 10 12.50
6 Mojito 90 80 10 12.50
7 Lemon Iced Tea 20 20 0 0.00
Soft Drink
1 Soda 330 ML 12 9 3 33.33
2 Lime Cordial Peg 10 8 2 25.00
3 Honey 1 Spoon 6 5 1 20.00
4 Cold Drink 300 ML 14 12 2 16.67
5 Diet Pepsi 330 ML 30 27 3 11.11
6 Diet Coke 330 ML 36 33 3 9.09
7 Tonic Water Schwepps 300ML 40 37 3 8.11
Note
* The rates in Blue colour shows the price hike more than 12%
# The rates in Red colour shows the price hike more than 25%
“After the recent hike, effected nearly a month after the inauguration of the new building of the Club on March 28, 2008, the average bar and food bills of the members have gone up by as much as 50 to 60 per cent. And this is not because that the members have increased their level of liquor intake or consumption of food items at the club. The consumption of these items by the members is more or less the same,” Sai Prasan, who had contested for the post of the Club's treasurer in 2006-08 elections, said after studying his and some other's bill for the last two months.
According to him, the 'outgoing' Managing Committee of the Club - led by its “Hon” Secretary Mr Gurbir Singh has jacked up the prices of both the food and bar items by 12 per cent to 95 per cent. The hike is more steep in food items than in the bar menu.
Sai Prasan is quite right as we, in our own study, found that the hike of a simple item like Shing is more than 50 per cent, while in the case of Surmai fish the hike is almost 100 per cent.
The new rates for the bar and food came into effect since April 29, 2008 when the inflation rate was below 8 per cent. The general impression among the members regularly visiting is that the MC has left no stone unturned to turn the club into a starred Hotel, where only elite sections of the society can afford to spend.
“There is no difference in the price list of a big bar & Hotel and the Press Club, now nicknamed the Club House", a member working for a language newspaper lamented, adding that now only those few members who earned fat salary in pink newspapers could afford to come to their club.
The other facts also falsify the secretary's reason to effect the price hike. The MC's annual report clearly says that as compared with the financial year 2006-07, expenses on the staff salary etc has remained more or less the same in the year 2007-08 and water and other charges are also the same. The members used the new club building just for four days in the last financial year and therefore they have reasons to know the actual reason for increase in the power charges.
Proper accounting norms say that the expenses on consumption of power in construction work of the new building has to be showed under separate heads.
And if the power charges have gone up in the club during the last two months because of air conditioning, then who is responsible for it? Is it not an architectural blunder that no provision has been made for ordinary fans in the area covered by Centralised Cooling System (CCS), which would have come in handy in turning off the CCS when it is not required?
Not only the Bar room, the Media Room and Lounge and Reception Counter area, but even the staircase and toilet are centrally air conditioned!! What is the total sitting capacity in the entire Centralised AC covered area and what was the sitting capacity in the same area in the old building? We can say with all the facts at our command that the sitting capacity in the said area has in fact gone down substantially.
If Mr Gurbir Singh does not agree with us, then let him provide the figures. We can only add to what we have said. Even the numbers of urinals and toilets have gone down.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)